Google +

Add This

Bookmark and Share

Monday, December 26, 2011

REVEAL THE KEY REASONS WHY LED LIGHTS IN SEATTLE ARE REALLY IRRESISTIBLE

Link

REVEAL THE KEY REASONS WHY LED LIGHTS IN SEATTLE ARE REALLY IRRESISTIBLE





Despite all the press coverage and thorough promotional endeavors, very little individuals have been attracted to swap over energy-efficient lighting fixtures.
According to a report via the Department of Energy, sales of CFLs are already going down since its height in 2007. Even in Seattle, which is certainly initiating a plan to endorse street lamps that use energy efficient LEDs, consumer demand for eco-friendly lights is unimpressive. Even there is a continuous retrofitting of LED lights in Seattle, Washington’s 45,000 street lamps, property owners still aren’t flocking to have the high-tech lamps.
A change would be good because there won’t be much solution soon. There exists now a federal rules that requires suppliers to roll out light bulbs that discharge the same luminosity but employ less electricity than conventional incandescent light bulbs. A phase-in of the innovative law started January 2010 utilizing 100-watt light bulbs. Osram Sylvania’s appraisal records that very little people are informed about this ruling, in reality, just 2 in 10 know about the upcoming extinction of 100-watt light bulbs. The handful of buyers who know about the improvement choose to merely stockpile incandescent 100-watt light bulbs while these are still on the market.
Consumer Reports enjoy blogging jokingly described these buyers as “Lightbulb Luddites.” They continuously avoid fresh technology even if it’s far better. It could be that the price remains a turn-off but a bit more information can help buyers choose the newer, better alternative to incandescents.
The new laws actually doesn’t ban any particular lighting technology. And neither does it showcase one over another. It basically demands bulbs to become efficient by 25%. Thing is, conventional incandescent light bulbs can’t satisfy this standard.
The swirly CFLs are a terrific technology and that these are achieving better. But nonetheless halogen and LED lighting fixtures get more interesting advantages. Acquire halogen or LED lights in Seattle, Washington and you will see that they’re entirely dimmable and come to full brightness swiftly. They also don’t include mercury. But, yes, these prove more costly.
Even so, remember that whatever uses energy has a two-fold cost: the initial price and the electrical power cost during its life time. CFLs score on both counts. In the time you’d exchange a CFL bulb, you would’ve replaced your first incandescent 10 times by this time. Stats for the LEDs are considerably better, as they can last as much as 50,000 hours with uninterrupted use.
Furthermore, CFLs don’t work effectively in dimmable push buttons. And maximum luminosity is achieved quite slowly and gradually still. They also don’t react well in cold temperature.
And as they’re fluorescents, CFLs hold trace amounts of mercury, and that is potentially harmful when the lamp fixture breaks. There are methods around this possibility, though. You can take exhausted, unbroken light bulbs at a Home Depot store, that may wipe out CFLs correctly.
LEDs do not go through any of these negatives. And if you wish further verification, the LED lights project in Seattle, Washington isn’t slowing down. The city will be fitting around 10,000 more LED streetlights in 2011. It’s also casting a wider net, calling all lighting designers to submit a proposition to indulge in the move.





 To Read More   Click Here

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Clean energy is just one part of the web

Clean energy is just one part of the web
A meaningful and legally binding new climate agreement seems as unlikely to emerge as it is urgently needed

Expert View | Thomas Kerr





Anyone watching the climate negotiations in Durban would be forgiven for giving in to despair. COP 17, or the 17th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations (UN) Convention on Climate Change, seems headed for a deadlock. Against a backdrop of financial turmoil, negotiators from 194 nations gathered in South Africa are tackling the usual intractable problems: how should the burden of cutting carbon emissions be shared between the developed and the developing world; and who should help poor countries shoulder the cost of climate change.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (R) speaks as Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg (C) and German politician Caio Koch-Weser (L) listen during a climate change conference in Durban, South Africa, on Wednesday. Photo: AP
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (R) speaks as Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg (C) and German politician Caio Koch-Weser (L) listen during a climate change conference in Durban, South Africa, on Wednesday. Photo: AP
Unfortunately, a meaningful and legally binding new climate agreement seems as unlikely to emerge as it is urgently needed. The Kyoto Protocol, which commits most wealthy nations to trimming carbon emissions, expires next year. Meanwhile, the latest figures from the UN show that the year 2011 caps a decade that ties the record as the hottest ever measured.While the international, top-down approach to tackling climate change flounders, there is some reason to hope that a different sort of initiative could make a difference. From Tanzania to India to South Africa, local and national schemes that take an entrepreneurial approach to the challenge of protecting the environment are bearing fruit. A growing number of governments and industries are working together to design policies and market-based approaches that funnel public and private funds into environmentally sustainable investment. “Green growth” initiatives provide a chink of optimistic light in an otherwise bleak landscape.
In India, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission—a part of the government’s National Action Plan on Climate Change—aims to deploy 20,000 megawatts (MW) by 2020. The scheme has already made some progress: solar power has contributed an additional 650MW of capacity. Market forces, in this instance, are playing a positive role. The global cost of solar panels has plunged by 40% this year as manufacturers, particularly in China, increase production. If prices continue to fall in this way, some experts predict that solar power in India could become as cheap as fossil fuel-based energy within the next three-four years. To ensure that the solar sector reaches its full potential, however, public sector support is needed to invest in infrastructure and to lure in private capital.
On a smaller scale, individual entrepreneurs can set an inspiring precedent. Four years ago, Gyanesh Pandey created a green business based on turning discarded rice husk into energy. His company, Husk Power Systems Pvt. Ltd (HPS), has installed 60 mini power plants that run entirely on biomass fuel, powering 25,000 households. As well as cutting green house gas emissions, the company has employed over 300 people in rural India. Its expansion plans are ambitious: by 2014, HPS wants to serve 6,500 villages, save 750,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, and create 7,000 local jobs.
Producing clean energy is just one part of the web of interconnected challenges posed by climate change. As temperatures rise and droughts become more frequent, the implications for food production and water resources are profound. In South Africa, where negotiators are struggling to thrash out a global agreement, it is predicted that water supplies could fall short of demand by as much as 17% by 2030. To respond to this situation, the country has recently launched a public-private leadership group called the South Africa Strategic Water Partners Network, to find ways of making agricultural uses of water more efficient and to reduce waste.
On a smaller level, one successful private-public collaboration is the eMalahleni water reclamation plant, situated in the coalfields of South Africa’s Mpumalanga province. The plant uses the latest purification technology to desalinate water from collieries, preventing polluted water from getting into the local river system while also providing drinking water and jobs. What’s more, after extensive research, the plant has put its waste product—gypsum—to use in the housing industry, meaning that it is on its way to becoming 100% waste-free.
Across Africa, countries are investing in “climate-smart” agriculture as a way to address the impact of climate change. In Tanzania, the government has launched the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor public-private partnership project with support from the World Economic Forum (WEF). It aims to boost investment in green agribusinesses and support smallholders in an area of the country that is vulnerable to climate change. Among other things, the project promotes agro-forestry, the practice of introducing trees and shrubs to farmland to create a more resilient environment.
All these disparate threads are encouraging, but they need to weave together into something more substantial. In an attempt to boost the scale of green development and to tackle climate change from the bottom up, WEF this week hosted the Durban Growth Series of talks along with the South African government, running parallel to the UN summit. The sessions, attended by South Africa President Jacob Zuma along with 50 leaders from business and the non-governmental organization (NGO) community, sparked calls for closer global coordination on green growth strategies. Given the scale of the challenges, it is important for everyone—governments and businesses, NGOs and individuals—to work together to build solutions from the bottom up, as well as from the top down. Instead of despairing, we need to bring all of man’s ingenuity and enterprise to bear on this vast, man-made problem.
Thomas Kerr is director, climate change initiatives, World Economic Forum.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Waste Dumping In Open Space Is A Criminal Offence

Waste Dumping In Open Space Is A Criminal Offence

Kerala High Court directed the the state policy to dumping waste in open a criminal offence in Kerala | By Yentha

On Nov 21, 2011

Kochi: Kerala High Court division bench Monday directed the state policy to register criminal offence against those who dump waste on the streets. Justice CN Ramachandran Nair and Justice P S Gopinathan of the bench asked all local bodies to ensure the same.

Hearing the cases relating to waste management in Kerala, the High Court made this rule. It comes close on the heels of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) blaming the Kerala State Pollution Control Board. The board blamed the State Government and urban local bodies for not managing the waste generated despite being the country’s most literate state.

p.a.l.s. carbon calculator

no2co2

p.a.l.s. carbon calculator

Answer a few simple questions and measure your carbon footprint using the p.a.l.s. carbon footprint calculator powered by our knowledge partner no2co2

Location Details

Location
Pincode

How many people in your household are above 13 years of age?

Energy Details

Monthly Electricity Bill

   Rs

What kind of fuel do you use for cooking?

LPG Cylinder Piped Gas Neither

Food Details

How much milk is consumed in your household per week?

   litres

How many times in a week do you eat mutton/beef/pork?

   meals

How many times in a week do you eat rice?

   meals

City Travel Details

What is your weekly expense on autorickshaw?

   Rs

What is your weekly expense on taxi?

   Rs

What is your weekly expense on AC taxi?

   Rs

What is your weekly expense on bus?

   Rs

What is your weekly expense on AC bus?

   Rs

How many local train (round)trips do you make in a week?

Average one-way duration
hrs min

Do you use a chartered/office/school bus?

Yes No

Private Vehicle Details

Do you use a privately owned vehicle?

Yes No

Long Distance Travel Details

How many international flight (round) trips do you make in a year?

Short (< 4 hrs)
Medium (4 - 8 hrs)

Long(> 8 hrs)

How many domestic flight (round) trips do you make in a year?

Short (< 0.75 hrs)
Medium (0.75 - 1.5 hrs)

Long (> 1.5 hrs)

How many long distance train (round) trips do you make in a year?

Short (< 4 hrs)
Medium (4 - 12 hrs)

Long (> 12 hrs)

How many long distance bus (round) trips do you make in a year?

Short (< 4 hrs)
Medium (4 - 12 hrs)

Long (> 12 hrs)

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Illegal Recycling: Another danger in India's E-waste Story

Illegal Recycling: Another danger in India's E-waste Story

The manner in which the mountain of piling e-waste needs to be dealt with is the next difficult problem on the anvil

Shilpa Shanbhaghttp://dqindia.ciol.com/content/GreenIT/2011/111021501.asp

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

 

The speed of global e-waste generation is growing by about 40 mn tonnes per year. If this figure is frightening then the manner in which it is being handled is even more scary. In developed nations, electronics recycling takes place in purpose-built recycling plants under controlled conditions. In many EU states, plastics from e-waste are not recycled to avoid brominated furans and dioxins being released into the atmosphere. E-waste is a rising danger for the developing nations as often in violation of international laws their developed counterparts dump them with the waste.

According to the critics of the trade in used electronics, it is an easy task for brokers to export unscreened e-waste to developing countries like China, India, parts of Africa, etc, by impersonating as recyclers. This method of functioning enables them to avoid the expense of removing items like bad cathode ray tubes (the processing of which is expensive and difficult).

According to the report entitled, Recyclingfrom E-Waste to Resources (issued at a meeting of Basel Convention and other world chemical authorities), in South Africa and China, it is estimated that by 2020 e-waste from old computers will jump by 200% to 400% from the levels reported in 2007. Meanwhile, the figure is expected to accelerate by 500% in India by 2020. By that same year in China, e-waste from discarded mobile phones will be about 7 times higher than 2007 levels and, in India, 18 times higher. By 2020, e-waste from televisions will be 1.5 to 2 times higher in China and India, while in India e-waste from discarded refrigerators will double or triple.

But, why is such e-waste welcome ashore the Asian nations? The demand for e-waste in Asian countries began to accelerate as scrap yards seem to relish on the valuable substances like copper, iron, silicon, nickel and gold, that it can extract from the waste.